Explained from the “gambling table” point of view:
Let’s also assume that the gaming tables have been in the lobby for a year (using a more conservative figure) and only open eight hours a day (again, using the most conservative figure). According to progress, this table has played at least about 8 (hours) x 20 (one hour of games) x 365 (days) = 58400 games.
58400 times, then this paragraph (BBBBBBBBBB) is only a small part. These (BBBBBBBBBB) you see are the last 10 of the previous 58400, can’t you see that it is the beginning of another 58400 next year? How do you divide it and how exactly do you define its category?
Alternatively, the top 5 dealers (BBBBB) can also be Casinoseen as the last 5 58400 times, and the last 5 dealers can be seen as the juncture of the next year’s game (58400 times). So, next year’s race is scheduled to run 58,400 times, why is it so strange to start 5 times in a row at the beginning? What is the reference value? To elaborate: this paragraph (BBBBBBBBBB) can also be understood as the first 9 times of r, the end of the previous year is the beginning of the next year’ So how does your probabilistic thinking work?
Purely depending on how you look at this paragraph (BBBBBBBBBB), you can understand it as a weird game, or you can see it as a short paragraph without meaning, a long, endless table game. A little pawn and you Casino can explain the plot. Finally, a theoretical data is interspersed: If we want to look at the 58,400 hands according to the principle of “permutation and combination”, how many combinations will there be? It should be: Please the computer can’t figure it out! So why is it so strange to have 10 such dealing games in a row? It’s just a piece of sand by the sea.
Purely depending on how you look at this paragraph (BBBBBBBBBB), you can understand it as a weird game, or you can see it as a short paragraph without meaning, a long, endless table game. A little pawn and you can explain the plot. Finally, a theoretical data is interspersed: If we want to look at the 58,400 hands acco Casinording to the principle of “permutation and combination”, how many combinations will there be? It should be: Please the computer can’t figure it out! So why is it so strange to have 10 such dealing games in a row? It’s just a piece of sand by the sea.
Or you can say categorically that the records you collect will often help you and help you win a big game! The end of the law has been mastered, and the way to crack it is close at hand. Occasionally help? Yes, the question is how many times have you experimented? Is there more than 100 million times? Is the probability of success so high that you can feel at ease and confident every time you make a shot? I know, you can’t answ Casinoer this question! The probability of success remains at 1/2.
“Find trends, drive trends” is an illusion. Those who think they can ride a trend don’t try it time and time again, only to occasionally find it in the poker crowd that fits the trend they’ve created.
Various trends, and then continue to give yourself confidence’ this kind of vague self-confidence, as long as it encounters it a few times in the casino, it will often collapse immediately. From a casino standpoint, “Strange Hand J” isn’t surprising at all. We attend so infrequently that we are easily intimidated, but in their eyes it is a small matter.
Whether you’re predicting a single hop, two hops, or a popping Casino, there’s no fixed accuracy that’s sufficient for the prediction function. No matter what kind of skills, theories, knowledge, logic, creativity…, we cannot use past records to predict the direction of subsequent games, and everything still remains in an irreversible truth: every time a baccarat card is opened, ” The probability of Zhuang and Xian appearing is 1/2. No matter how weird and stable the previous trend is, it will not affect the next result! “Smart gambling capital allocation” and “flexible chip allocation” are king! Find the trend , Predicting the next round will only pull you into a deeper vortex, and plunge you into a dark undercurrent that is difficult to escape.